A rule of thumb for managed futures performance is
that if there is little movement in the underlying asset classes, there will be
negative performance for the average managed futures manager. While it does not
apply to all managers, certainly trend-followers need trends, and a measure of
trend is the longer-term volatility or spread in prices.
If there is no spread over the month, there is not
enough information to find signals and profit from trades. Of course, I can say
this as a truism, but it is not easy to predict the price range, so one cannot
generally determine at the beginning of the month whether there will be good
opportunities or not. Nevertheless, the current low volatility environment has
placed downward pressure on manager performance.
With bonds and equities following range-bound
behavior, managed futures, in general, posted a negative month as measured by
the SocGen CTA index. Managed futures is still positive for the year
with most asset classes clustered between 2 and 8 percent except for the long
bond. The high bond performance has been an outlier based on some out-sized return
months associated with central bank behavior. This behavior can continue
given the long duration of bonds in a low interest rate environment, but the
low current yields are providing no cushion for investors.
While general returns may be clustered, a look at individual
managers will find 2016 as a great year for many managers who have generated
double-digit returns. The averages of an index will hide the
good managers. A quick survey from last month using CTA Intelligence
data of the top 40 largest managers showed 18 or just under
50 percent with double digit returns. The upside opportunity for
double-digit performance from medium and small managers seems to
exist in the same proportions albeit with wider spread.
No comments:
Post a Comment